Elder Financial Abuse

Elder Financial Abuse in California: What Families Can Do

By Arthur E. Rothrock, Founder11 min read
On this page

If someone took advantage of your parent, the elder financial abuse California statute gives your family a civil claim with teeth. The property can come back, the abuser can be ordered to pay your attorney's fees, and in many cases the court can order double the value taken. Maybe a caregiver drained the checking account, a brother with a power of attorney put the house in his name, or a new "friend" walked Mom into a notary's office to sign a trust amendment. Every one of those is covered.

You have four years from the day you discovered the facts to file, or one year from the abuser's death if that person has since died. Here's the thing families get wrong. They wait for "the estate to settle" while the abuser keeps moving money.

What counts as elder financial abuse in California?

The statute lawyers call Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.30 is broad on purpose. Financial abuse happens when someone "takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains" the property of an elder, meaning a person 65 or older living in California (Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 15610.27, 15610.30). The taking must be for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, or by undue influence. Wrongful use means the person "knew or should have known that this conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder or dependent adult" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.30).

Undue influence is "excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting by overcoming that person's free will and results in inequity" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.70; Probate Code § 86). Courts weigh the victim's vulnerability, the influencer's authority, the tactics used, and how unfair the result was. The tactics read like a checklist of what families see: controlling medication or information, cutting off contact, using affection or intimidation, and rushing changes through in secret. An unfair result "without more" is not enough; our guide to undue influence in California covers the proof.

A signature does not launder a taking. The statute covers property lost "by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.30). So a gift deed, a "loan" nobody meant to repay, and a new will or trust amendment all count. It also reaches property held by a representative, including an agent under a power of attorney.

Who can be held liable for elder financial abuse in California?

The law reaches anyone who takes an elder's property, and anyone who "assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining" it (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.30). The reported defendants are family.

The son with the power of attorney. In Keading v. Keading, while his sister was out of town, a son rushed their father to a UPS store to sign a new power of attorney naming him agent. Within weeks he used it to deed the family home out of the trust to himself and his father as joint tenants. The father died five days later. The trial court found undue influence and elder financial abuse, declared the deed invalid, and entered a judgment of more than $1.5 million, affirmed on appeal.

The spouse. In Lintz v. Lintz a third wife was held liable for financial elder abuse, undue influence, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion of her husband's separate property. Affirmed; transactions between spouses carry a presumption of undue influence. If the new spouse started out as your parent's caregiver, read what California law allows when a caregiver married your parent.

The trustee. In Asaro v. Maniscalco a nephew who was co-trustee of the family trust moved $430,000 in certificates of deposit and a piece of real estate to himself, and the breaches were concealed from a beneficiary. The judgment for breach of trust and financial elder abuse was affirmed.

Caregivers, "friends," and bookkeepers stand in the same shoes. If your parent's plan changed late in life in favor of one person, read what to do when a sibling or caregiver got everything.

What can you recover in an elder financial abuse case?

Here is the menu of damages for financial elder abuse California courts can order.

RemedyWhat it meansRule
Return of the propertyThe property or its value comes backProbate Code §§ 850, 859
Compensatory damagesThe losses the taking causedWelfare and Institutions Code § 15657.5
Attorney's fees and costsMandatory once financial abuse is provenWelfare and Institutions Code § 15657.5
Double damages"Twice the value of the property recovered"Probate Code § 859
Treated as having died firstTakes none of what the court recovers for the estateProbate Code § 259
Punitive damagesClear and convincing proof of oppression, fraud, or maliceCivil Code § 3294; Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.5

Fees are not optional. Prove financial abuse by a preponderance of the evidence and "the court shall award to the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.5). Shall, not may. In Lintz the children recovered their fees for proving the abuse. Fees are what make an elder financial abuse California claim different from an ordinary lawsuit.

Double is added on top. A person who took property through elder financial abuse is liable for "twice the value of the property recovered" (Probate Code § 859). Asaro v. Maniscalco held that penalty comes on top of returning the property, rejecting an earlier reading in Conservatorship of Ribal. Take $100,000: it comes back, plus $200,000.

Whether you must also prove bad faith is a split. Two of the statute's three routes to double damages say "in bad faith" on their face; the financial elder abuse route does not. In Levin v. Winston-Levin the court voided a trust amendment for undue influence but found no bad faith and refused double damages. Keading v. Keading disagreed two years later. It held that the statute "authorizes an award of double damages for the commission of elder financial abuse without a separate finding of bad faith," the reading Hill v. Superior Court had already given it.

As of this writing the split stands, so plead and prove bad faith anyway. Hill also held that double damages are not punitive damages, so they can be pursued against the abuser's estate if the abuser has died.

Being treated as having died first under Probate Code § 259 takes clear and convincing evidence. You must show financial abuse, bad faith, and reckless, oppressive, fraudulent, or malicious conduct, against a parent who could not manage money or resist undue influence.

How long do you have to sue for elder financial abuse?

The financial elder abuse statute of limitations California applies is four years. The clock starts when you discover, or "through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered, the facts constituting the financial abuse" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.7). In Asaro the trustees never sent notice that the trust had become irrevocable and hid what they had done, so the beneficiary's claim was timely years later.

Now the trap. If the abuser has died, any claim that could have been brought against that person while alive must be filed within one year of the death (Code of Civil Procedure § 366.2). The period "shall not be tolled or extended for any reason" beyond a short list. Stoltenberg v. Newman applied it even though the defendant was the successor trustee of the dead person's trust. Four years shrinks to one the day the abuser dies.

A petition to recover property for a trust or estate under Probate Code § 850 has no deadline of its own; it borrows the clock of the underlying wrong (Estate of Yool). For the other clocks, see how long you have to contest a trust or will. The deadline wizard will give you a date.

Where do you file an elder financial abuse case in Santa Clara County?

When the money ran through a trust or an estate, which in Silicon Valley is most of the time, the case goes to the probate court in San Jose, the Santa Clara County Superior Court. It is usually a Probate Code § 850 petition with the elder abuse claim attached. Families in Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, and Cupertino file there; Peninsula and East Bay matters go to the San Mateo, Alameda, and San Francisco courts. Our guide to trust and estate litigation in Santa Clara County covers how those cases run.

Two other tracks run beside the civil case, and neither replaces it. Santa Clara County Adult Protective Services takes reports on a 24-hour line, (408) 975-4900 or (800) 414-2002, and anyone can report. APS investigates; it does not file your civil case.

Theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud against a person 65 or older is also a crime (Penal Code § 368), and the Santa Clara County District Attorney has an Elder Fraud Unit. A conviction can support disinheritance (Probate Code § 259). A prosecutor's job is punishment, not your family's recovery, so report and then file the civil case.

What should you do next?

  1. Write down when you first learned something was wrong, and how. That date drives the four-year clock.
  2. Pull the paper: bank statements, the power of attorney, any deed, the trust and every amendment, and caregiver logs.
  3. Save the messages. Haste, secrecy, and "don't tell your sister" are evidence.
  4. Get the medical records. Your parent's condition at each signature is the heart of the case.
  5. If a trust is involved, demand an accounting in writing. If the abuser is the trustee, see removing a trustee for breach of fiduciary duty.
  6. Talk to an elder financial abuse attorney this week, especially if the abuser has died or is ill.

Frequently asked questions

Does my parent have to be alive to sue for elder financial abuse?

No. After the elder's death "the right to commence or maintain an action shall pass to the personal representative" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.3). If there is none, an heir, the successor in interest, or an interested person such as a trust beneficiary can sue. In Asaro a trust beneficiary pursued the claim for the elder after her death.

Is it elder financial abuse if my parent agreed to the gift?

It can be. The statute covers property lost "by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest" (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.30). The question is whether the signature was obtained by undue influence, by fraud, or for a wrongful use. A parent who freely chose to favor one child has not been abused, and an unfair result "without more" is not proof (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.70).

Can I report it to the police and still sue?

Yes. The criminal case belongs to the District Attorney under Penal Code § 368; the civil case belongs to your family. A conviction is one of two independent paths to treating the abuser as having died before your parent, as to what the case recovers (Probate Code § 259). Do not wait for a prosecutor's decision before you file.

Does the abuser pay my lawyer?

If you win, yes. Fees and costs are mandatory once financial abuse is proven (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.5), and a court may add fees under Probate Code § 859. We discuss how the case itself is funded at the first conversation.

What if the abuser is my sibling and also the trustee?

That is one of the most common fact patterns in elder financial abuse cases. A beneficiary can petition to remove a trustee who has breached the trust, and the court can suspend the trustee's powers while it decides (Probate Code §§ 15642, 17200). In Keading the sister filed an ex parte petition within weeks of finding the deed. She asked the court to suspend her brother as trustee, appoint a successor, and confirm the trust's ownership of the house.

What is the elder financial abuse California statute of limitations?

Four years from the date you discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the facts (Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.7). If the abuser has died, one year from the death (Code of Civil Procedure § 366.2), with no tolling beyond a short list. If a trust contest is also in play, the 120-day deadline in Probate Code § 16061.8 runs separately.

Talk to a trust litigation lawyer in San Jose

Rothrock Legal handles financial elder abuse cases, and the trust and estate disputes that travel with them, for families in San Jose, Santa Clara County, and across the Bay Area. If you are looking for an elder abuse attorney San Jose families can reach this week, request a consult and bring the bank statements, the power of attorney, and the deed. We will tell you who may be liable and how many days you have left.

This article is general information about California law, not legal advice about your situation. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Rothrock Legal; that happens only when both sides sign an engagement letter. Deadlines depend on facts we have not seen and the law changes. Before you rely on any date here, confirm it with a lawyer.

Start with a consult request.

Tell us what happened, in writing or by voice, and upload what you have. We strive to respond within one business day.